View all Mac apps. Popular Windows Apps. Avast Free Antivirus. IrfanView (64-bit) Driver Easy. WhatsApp for PC. Panda Free Antivirus. Please submit your review for. Xamarin.Android requires a 64-bit edition of Windows and the 64-bit Java Development Kit (JDK). Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 for Mac. The Build Tools support the same system requirements as Visual Studio with the following changes. For a long time now developers have been asking why Visual Studio hasn’t made to switch to 64-bit. Rather than effort or opportunity cost, the primary reason is performance. This may seem counter-intuitive, but shift from 32-bit to 64-bit isn’t an automatic win. While you can benefit from having access to more CPU registers, that mostly benefits applications that are doing heavy number crunching on large arrays. ![]() With an application such as Visual Studio that work with large, complex data structures, the 64-bit pointer overhead dwarfs the benefits of more registers. Explains, Your pointers will get bigger; your alignment boundaries get bigger; your data is less dense; equivalent code is bigger. You will fit less useful information into one cache line, code and data, and you will therefore take more cache misses. Everything, but everything, will suffer. Now when I check About Google Chrome it gives me the error 'Update failed (error: 10)'. How to stop google chrome from auto-updates for mac. Last Chrome update brings me this kind of problem (i.e. Cd /Library/ sudo chown nobody:nogroup Google sudo chmod 000 Google cd ~/Library/ sudo chown nobody:nogroup Google sudo chmod 000 Google I did this immediately after installing the Chrome version I need for my machine, and it worked perfectly. In terminal: cd /Library/Google/ sudo chown nobody:nogroup GoogleSoftwareUpdate sudo chmod 000 GoogleSoftwareUpdate cd ~/Library/Google/ sudo chown nobody:nogroup GoogleSoftwareUpdate sudo chmod 000 GoogleSoftwareUpdate If you want to be double-certain, then do the same for the folder Google one level up. Apple's AirPods page which have quite 'heavy' moving picture) But it slow drastically as well, other Google elements such as Google Maps where I must use 'simplified' mode Hoping next Chrome update will fix this problem, but anyway, problem located possibly in some Apple models such as my Mac Pro 2010? Your processor's cache did not get bigger. Even other programs on your system that have nothing to do with the code you’re running will suffer. And you didn’t need the extra memory anyway. So you got nothing. Yay for speed-brakes. He goes on to say, Most of Visual Studio does not need and would not benefit from more than 4G of memory. Any packages that really need that much memory could be built in their own 64-bit process and seamlessly integrated into VS without putting a tax on the rest. This was possible in VS 2008, maybe sooner. Dragging all of VS kicking and screaming into the 64-bit world just doesn’t make a lot of sense. That isn’t to say Visual Studio can’t be improved. But Rico Mariani argues that the solution isn’t to give VS more memory, but rather make it use less. While it may not have the same sleek, modern look as the most recent editions of Microsoft Office or iWork, OpenOffice can easily handle all the same types of documents and tasks. Free microsoft publisher for mac. OpenOffice can open all of its counterpart's file formats and runs a smaller module. Streamlined interface: Some open source tools can be intimidating to use, but OpenOffice has a straightforward and feature-loaded but accessible interface. For basic word processing, number crunching, or creating presentations, the apps in OpenOffice offer everything you need, front and center. Now if you have a package that needs >4G of data *and* you also have a data access model that requires a super chatty interface to that data going on at all times, such that say SendMessage for instance isn’t going to do the job for you, then I think maybe rethinking your storage model could provide huge benefits. In the VS space there are huge offenders. My favorite to complain about are the language services, which notoriously load huge amounts of data about my whole solution so as to provide Intellisense about a tiny fraction of it. That doesn’t seem to have changed since 2010. I used to admonish people in the VS org to think about solutions with say 10k projects (which exist) or 50k files (which exist) and consider how the system was supposed to work in the face of that. Loading it all into RAM seems not very appropriate to me. But if you really, no kidding around, have storage that can’t be economized and must be resident then put it in a 64-bit package that’s out of process. Turning back to the question of more registers, Rico adds, But as it turns out the extra registers don't help an interactive application like VS very much, it doesn't have a lot of tight compute intensive loops for instance. And also the performance of loads off the stack is so good when hitting the L1 that they may as well be registers -- except the encode length of the instruction is worse. But then the encode length of the 64 bit instructions with the registers is also worse. So, ya, YMMV [your mileage may vary], but mostly those registers don't help big applications nearly so much as they help computation engines. A frequent criticism of this stance is the shift from 16-bit to 32-bit applications. Developers in the mid to late 90’s universally hailed that change as beneficial all around.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2019
Categories |